NASA revises Moon landing plans for Starship and Blue Moon
The agency plans earlier docking for Starship and is developing a rocket stage that would let Orion meet Blue Moon closer to the lunar surface.
The agency plans earlier docking for Starship and is developing a rocket stage that would let Orion meet Blue Moon closer to the lunar surface.

NASA has detailed revised Artemis Moon landing plans intended to reduce demands on landers built by SpaceX and Blue Origin as it targets a crewed landing in 2028. NASA has also directed Axiom Space to develop a lighter spacesuit for shorter surface excursions.
The previous arrangement required both landers to meet Orion in a high lunar orbit called a near-rectilinear halo orbit. Orion’s service module, which provides propulsion, cannot take the spacecraft from Earth into low lunar orbit and back to Earth. That left the landers responsible for the longer journey between the meeting point and the surface. NASA’s revised plans give each provider a different route.
According to NASASpaceflight, the proposed “sortie” suit would be a lighter, simpler derivative of Axiom’s Axiom Extravehicular Mobility Unit, or AxEMU. NASA’s direction aims to accelerate availability by reducing mass and simplifying the suit’s connections with the landers.
The suit is intended to be certified for shorter surface excursions, with a minimum supported duration of two hours at a time—not a two-hour maximum. It would not be certified for the permanently shadowed regions near the lunar south pole or support the longer campaigns involving multiple spacewalks planned for the full AxEMU, NASASpaceflight reports. Those limits would restrict both where initial crews could work and the surface operations they could undertake.
The schedule pressure follows earlier development problems. NASASpaceflight reports that a 2024 preliminary design review found the AxEMU exceeded its mass allocation, and suit testing originally targeted for 2025 was deferred to 2027. NASA’s Office of Inspector General called the earlier timeline “overly optimistic” and warned that the suits might not be ready until 2031 if delays matched historical averages. That was a conditional assessment, not a delivery schedule.

Charlie Precourt raised the estimate while assessing Artemis IV risks. SpaceX founder Elon Musk disputed it, forecasting six to eight flights to supply the propellant needed for a lunar voyage.
4 min
The proposed approach trades some surface capability for a simpler suit intended to support the 2028 landing goal. It remains a development plan, not a completed certification. The full-capability AxEMU continues in development for later missions, according to NASASpaceflight.
NASA says neither company now has an assignment to a specific Artemis lunar landing mission. Under the original contracts, SpaceX was assigned Artemis III and IV, while Blue Origin was assigned Artemis V. Both companies will instead participate in the Artemis III Earth-orbit demonstrations, and NASA will select the first lunar landing provider according to readiness. The agency targets that landing for 2028, with a second crewed landing opportunity to follow.
Both providers must complete an uncrewed demonstration mission before carrying astronauts to the Moon, and NASA must certify their landers. Revised contracts also add development checks: SpaceX will conduct two crew-cabin demonstrations, while Blue Origin will add tests involving human operators and milestones for hardware readiness. NASA describes these requirements as measures intended to reduce risk before crewed landings.
SpaceX plans to collect supercold liquid propellant in low Earth orbit. Tanker Starships would supply a depot spacecraft, which would then fuel the lunar lander. After docking with Orion in high Earth orbit, the lander would fire its engines to send both spacecraft toward low lunar orbit. NASA says it is working to modify Orion so Starship can push it to the Moon.
The four astronauts would travel inside Orion. Two would transfer to Starship for several days on the surface while two remained aboard Orion. NASA says using low lunar orbit would significantly reduce the propellant Starship must collect and shorten the time needed to return astronauts from the surface to Orion.
| Who gave the estimate | Tanker launches | Position |
|---|---|---|
| NASA safety panel | About 22 | Reported as the current estimate on 22 October |
| SpaceX founder Elon Musk | 6–8 | Disputed the panel’s estimate |
NASA officials declined to give a precise count on 23 October. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said six to eight launches was possible but represented Starship’s “ultimate potential end state.” The count depends on how much Starship can carry, how much supercold methane and liquid oxygen evaporate in orbit, and how efficiently spacecraft transfer those propellants.
Blue Origin’s initial landing plan defers propellant transfer between spacecraft. Ars Technica reported that three New Glenn launches would place three transfer stages—propulsion units that push other spacecraft—into low Earth orbit, followed by a fourth launch carrying the Blue Moon Mark 2 lander.
NASA specifies that the stages would propel the Mark 2 Alpha lander toward an elliptical polar lunar orbit, an elongated path over the Moon’s poles. The chart described by Ars Technica placed the meeting orbit with Orion approximately 8,500 kilometers above the surface. Two astronauts would transfer to Blue Moon for a landing near the lunar south pole.
NASASpaceflight’s account describes two transfer stages separating on the journey to the Moon. The third would remain attached until after the crew transferred from Orion, then lower the lander into low lunar orbit before its final descent. NASA says the elliptical polar route would reduce Blue Moon’s propellant needs and allow faster returns from the surface to Orion compared with the previously planned halo orbit.
NASA is also developing the option of a low-lunar-orbit meeting with Blue Moon. According to Ars Technica, NASA is working with United Launch Alliance on an extended Centaur V upper stage—the rocket section that provides propulsion after the lower stage has done its work. Combined with the Space Launch System’s core stage, it would allow Orion to reach low lunar orbit.
Meeting a few hundred kilometers above the Moon would significantly reduce the propellant Blue Moon needs to carry astronauts down and back, NASA Artemis program manager Jeremy Parsons said. He said the lower orbit would also offer more frequent and faster opportunities to leave the surface if needed. This remains an option under development, separate from the specified elliptical polar meeting route.
At its 23 October briefing, NASA retained a summer 2027 target for Artemis III and a 2028 launch target for Artemis IV, which would include a lunar landing. NASA’s official Artemis III plan describes a roughly 14-day mission in low Earth orbit involving four astronauts and test versions of both landers.
Orion would first dock with Blue Moon. Astronauts would enter the test vehicle and spend approximately two days evaluating its cabin, controls and life-support systems, including atmosphere and pressure. Blue Moon would launch first, with Orion following only after the lander was confirmed healthy and ready.
Orion would then dock with a Starship test vehicle for up to two hours, but astronauts would not enter Starship. That demonstration would assess how the docked spacecraft handle control, communications and software, as well as docking and undocking. NASA plans to use the two demonstrations to check hardware and procedures before attempting a crewed lunar landing.

The upper stage survived Flight 13’s July splashdown. Its return gives engineers the chance to inspect hardware after spaceflight and reentry.
2 min